I am no literary geek. In fact I
did not know quite a number of things that are considered general knowledge in
the reading world: Like George Eliot being a woman, the Harry Potter series’
general storyline, what the heck the Tournament of Books is and so on. (if you
are in any way like this, throw your hands up on me, lol ). But given that
we’re living in the Information age we’ve no excuse for not working on it.
One of the things I‘ve only
recently learned (*blush*) is that there are such things as literary and
commercial fictions. (DUH.) I am of course aware that there are books that
would amass sales and gain popularity either over time or upon its release that
may or may not have lasting effect to readers. And then there are humbler volumes
showing off pretty praises from them almighty critics. But I wasn’t sure there
was indeed an official classification so to speak.
I had often pondered on how I
forgo page-turners that front major bookstores and instead dig up underrated or
non-contemporary books that have seemingly boring or obscure premises. I also
talked about it just 2 posts ago.
Anyways, classifying works as
either a literary or a commercial would unavoidably, call for some
disagreements. But here is a really well-thought out take on what distinguishes
the two. Enjoy.
Thank you, Books On The Nightstand. :)
No comments:
Post a Comment